BY LES POWER
lpower@patriot-nos.com

HARRISBURG In the face of a rising protest
from Tea Party members, Pennsylvania Budget
Secretary Charles Zogby yesterday apologized for
expanding the definition of the “core functions of
government” to include protecting public health as
well as public safety.
Zogby used what he termed this “expansive”
definition in a speech to the Pennsylvania Press
Club on March 1.
After the speech was delivered, conservative observers
were initially pleased to discover that Zogby’s
definition didn’t include transportation, public
education, environmental protection, or taking
care of old people.
"If people choose to grow old,
that’s their responsibility” said Matt Brouillette,
president and CEO of the Commonwealth Foundation.
But a flurry across Twitter and the blogosphere
raised questions about what exactly “public health”
means and whether Zogby might be a mole from
a liberal interest group. Off the bat, the reference
to public health opened the door to a new round
of calls for the restoration of adultBasic, a low-cost
health insurance program for low-income adults.
“If people choose to get sick, that’s their responsibility,”
said Brouillette.
Shortly thereafter, environmental zealots tried to
sneak in the idea that protecting public health includes
regulating industry to reduce mercury poisoning
or other carcinogens. “If people choose to
expose themselves to toxics they can’t see or smell,”
said Brouillette, “that’s their responsibility.”
The last straw was when advocates argued that
research evidence showing the tight correlation
between income levels and health warranted an
increase in public assistance to poor people and
the unemployed. “If people choose to get laid off
through no fault of their own, that’s their responsibility,”
said Brouillette.
“I have seen the light,” said Zogby. “Public health
is a function you could drive a truck through. Any
broadening of the definition of government’s role
is a slippery slope that can lead to inexorable increases
in taxes and government taking even more
of your money.”
Zogby did admit he left out one critical core
function of government, “the protection of private
property rights.” He also said he was re-examining
whether “public safety is a bit broad. We may want
to narrow that function to certain places.”
One questioner yesterday asked Zogby to comment
on research of economic historians which
shows that countries with narrow definitions of
government’s role tend to remain economically
backward. “I’m not familiar with that research,”
said Zogby, “and I do not plan to become so.”